Reddit closes sex work-related subreddits as FOSTA bill passes Senate

0
Ben
Updated March 22, 2018
Published March 22, 2018
We may earn a commission via links on our site.
Why?

Reddit wasted no time in closing down several sex work-related subreddits in response to the passing of the FOSTA (Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act) bill in the US yesterday.

The bill, which amends section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, claims that it aims to help protect the victims of sex trafficking. It states that section 230 “was never intended to provide legal protection to websites that unlawfully promote and facilitate prostitution and websites that facilitate traffickers in advertising the sale of unlawful sex acts with sex trafficking victims.”

However, as many other publications have pointed out, it’s a law that could have a chilling effect on any discussion of sex work online at all, which is ultimately bad for anyone involved, as well as a worrying clamp down on free speech.

According to Reason, Reddit almost immediately responded to the passage of the bill by removing four subreddits – ‘Escorts’, ‘Male Escorts’, ‘Hookers’, and ‘SugarDaddy’ – and updated its terms of use to cover the prohibition of a number of new items, including “Paid services involving physical sexual contact”.

Unfortunately, as many people tried to point out before the bill passed, it will do little – if anything – to genuinely help combat sex trafficking. Indeed, the reverse is true for a wide variety of reasons, not least of which is that sites like Backpage allow for some form of contact with victims of sex trafficking, as illustrated neatly in the embedded Twitter thread below by ErikaG, an anti-trafficking attorney based in the US.

https://twitter.com/egonz15/status/976593997660528640

With the bill passed in the Senate and House of Representatives, it’s expected to be signed into law by President Trump shortly.

For its part, Reddit will be far from the only platform to be affected by this change, though we’ll have to see exactly how some react in terms of clamping down on sex work-related discussion. It’s still not law. Yet.

Article by
Ben Woods is a journalist, editor, and media adviser who not only brought SEXTECHGUIDE to life but keeps it running smoothly on a day-to-day basis.Before embarking on this exciting journey, Ben’s work reached millions of people each month through reputable publications such as WIRED, TrustedReviews, The Inquirer, V3, CNET, ZDNet, and The Next Web, among many more.Ben dives deep into the realms of tech, sex, and the future on SEXTECHGUIDE, inviting readers to explore the intriguing intersection of these domains.
Get in touch
On the same topic…
  • uk illegal deepfakes

    Creating non-consensual deepfakes to be made illegal in England and Wales, but there are still gray areas

    Jamie F/
    April 17, 2024
  • Italian PM sues over deepfake porn

    ‘Sending a message’: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni sues over deepfake porn

    Jamie F/
    April 3, 2024
  • Debate on sustainable practices in eco-friendly sex tech: genuine commitment or mere greenwashing?

    Creating an eco-friendly sex tech industry: sustainable values or greenwashing tactics?

    Emilie L/
    October 1, 2024
By the same author…
  • bluesky adult content guide

    Bluesky adult content: Every feature that keeps your feed exactly how you want it

    Ben/
    November 13, 2024
  • sextechguide youtube ban

    SEXTECHGUIDE vs. YouTube: Unpacking the double standards in adult content moderation

    Ben/
    October 1, 2024
  • Meta Quest 3 porn guide.

    Meta Quest 3 porn guide: The AR passthrough experience will blow you away

    Ben/
    June 9, 2024

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *