1,025

We may earn a commission via links. Why?

When it comes to virtual partners, AI has come a long way. There are now dozens of platforms available, and the gap between the best and the rest is growing fast. Conversation quality, personality depth, memory and customization have all improved dramatically, making it harder than ever to separate the genuinely good AI companion apps from those trading on hype.

We’ve tested each of the platforms below ourselves to make sure our recommendations are genuine (and human!). We’ve kept things brief by covering the essential facts, pricing info, and the pros and cons for each app. Naturally, how your virtual relationship plays out is up to you, and likely to be different for each person. That’s really part of the point.

We’re only including platforms we’ve actually spent time with. This is still a fast-moving area: conversations are getting more engaging, memory is improving month by month, and new features roll out regularly, so we’ll continue updating this list as things change.

Our policy

Every platform on this list is for adults (18+) and creates adult, fictional characters only. Their creators are preset and prompt based: none of them accepts photo uploads of real people, and this list does not include any AI tool built for face-swap, deepswap or ‘undressing’ of anyone real.

We will remove any platform that introduces such features upon notification and review, and in July 2026 we did exactly that, removing two entries under this policy. Seduced AI is primarily a standalone image and video generator rather than a companion app (its own FAQ says as much), so it now belongs to the category we treat separately in our honest guide to AI porn. FreeGF AI’s video tools accept photo uploads of real people with no consent check in the flow, which fails the standard above, so it’s gone.

Laws in this area vary significantly from place to place and are moving quickly, so make sure you know what’s legal wherever you plan on using these services. We keep the snapshot below current, but you should also check your own country’s or state’s laws.

Synthetic images and the law: where things stand

The legal picture around AI-generated intimate imagery is moving fast and varies by region. Expand a region for the most significant recent developments, and follow the whole story in our image-based abuse coverage thread.

United States
  • May 2025: the TAKE IT DOWN Act criminalises publishing non-consensual intimate images, deepfakes included; its 48-hour platform takedown duty became enforceable in May 2026, and the first criminal charges landed in June 2026.
  • January 2026: the DEFIANCE Act passed the Senate, letting victims sue for up to $250,000; it now sits with the House.
  • August 2024: San Francisco’s City Attorney named 16 ‘nudify’ sites in a lawsuit, and had shut ten of them down by mid-2025.

46 states now have AI-media laws, and federal attention is shifting from sharing deepfakes to creating them.

United Kingdom
  • February 2026: the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 made creating, or even requesting, a non-consensual intimate deepfake a crime from 6 February 2026, even if it is never shared.
  • 2023 to 2024: the Online Safety Act 2023 made sharing deepfake intimate images illegal, with platform fines of up to 10% of global turnover.

Both creation and sharing are now criminal, and the Crime and Policing Act 2026 (Royal Assent April 2026) goes after the supply of ‘nudification’ tools themselves.

European Union
  • 2024 to 2025: the EU AI Act requires all AI-generated content to be disclosed and labelled, with fines up to 35 million euros or 7% of turnover.
  • 2026: an amendment to the AI Act bans nudify apps outright, with a December 2026 compliance deadline.
  • 2025: Denmark proposed treating a person’s likeness as intellectual property, and France criminalised non-consensual sexual deepfakes (up to 2 years).

The Digital Services Act adds notice-and-takedown duties, and member states keep adding their own criminal penalties.

Rest of the world
  • February 2026: India’s IT Rules Amendment 2026 requires deepfake intimate images to be removed within 2 hours of a complaint, plus visible watermarks and metadata on AI content.

India now has some of the world’s fastest takedown timelines, with a dedicated deepfake bill under consideration.

The five picks at a glance

Candy AIDreamGFKupid AIHeraHavenReplika
Adult chat and images
From (per month, annual billing)$3.99$5.99$7.99$6.65~$5.75
Native mobile app
Lifetime plan

Best AI girlfriend and virtual partner apps

Candy AI

Costs from$3.99/mo (billed annually)
PlatformWeb app

Candy AI is now one of the longest-standing services on this list, and actually spun out from Kupid AI after the co-founders decided to go their separate ways. As such, you’ll find a similar experience, though not one that’s exactly the same by any means, and it has diverged further as time has elapsed since the split.

Candy AI seems like a good balance that lets you both create a custom AI partner and carry out a solid conversation. It also lets you create custom anime AI companions, which is something the other platforms here do not offer. At the time of writing there are nine pre-created ‘Realistic’ female characters and seven Anime characters, though Premium members can create unlimited custom AI partners. When creating your own partner, you can not only choose the appearance, but also specify what kind of personality and interests they have, and define what sort of relationship you have with them (girlfriend, partner, colleague, and so on) from the outset.

In terms of image generation, we’ve never seen any phantom body parts or anything unappealing generated, though each character responds to the specificity of image requests differently. Our ‘Audrey’ character, for example, seems absolutely resolute on posing her way in every single image, even when we specify otherwise.

Pros

  • Generated images are high quality
  • Responses are fast and human-like on paid plans
  • Better conversations than DreamGF
  • Good balance of ‘character’ with customizability, including anime companions
  • Good value annual Premium plan, with a choice of 9 voices

Cons

  • Images generated during a chat can’t be expanded without going to your account gallery
  • Images don’t always follow the requests made (different clothing color or angle than requested, for example)

Pricing: Candy AI offers a single premium tier priced by commitment length: $12.99 monthly, $7.99/month over three months, or the heavily promoted 12-month plan at $3.99/month (billed annually at $47.88). Every length gets identical benefits: unlimited text messaging, custom AI partners, 100 tokens monthly, image generation, AI phone calls and fast responses. Billing is discreet (no ‘adult transaction’ on bank statements), with card and cryptocurrency options. The monthly tier is the risk-free way in; the three-month option at $7.99 is the sweet spot between savings and commitment. If you run out of tokens (new characters cost 10, image messages 2, voice playback 0.2 per message), add-on packs of 100, 500 and 1000 cost $9.99, $45.99 and $89.99 respectively.

Best for a great balance of customization, conversation and value. It’s also a strong pick if you specifically want an anime AI partner.

DreamGF AI

Costs from$5.99/mo (billed annually)
PlatformWeb app

DreamGF AI is a well-polished web app that works well on both mobile and desktop, bringing with it a less intimidating range of options than some of the others in this list, but still providing a great core experience. From the homepage it’s clear DreamGF is trying to cover every feature possible: voice messages, chat messages, personalized images in chats, custom scenarios, and a capable adult image generator for those more interested in visuals than virtual ‘personalities’. There are currently 36 fictional characters to chat with, plus a good custom character creation system.

Beyond chat, DreamGF leans heavily into image generation. On the top tiers it produces adult images readily, sometimes more readily than the prompt intends, so you may occasionally get an undressed result even when you ask for a clothed one. If conversation is your priority, Kupid and Candy do that better. The other drawbacks: images can sometimes feel a bit off, and the service still can’t send videos, a feature that appears to have been in the works for a couple of years already.

Pros

  • Highly customizable companions
  • Capable image generation
  • Simple and competitive pricing
  • Can try it completely free

Cons

  • Images sometimes aren’t very accurate to your request
  • Can ‘hallucinate’ parts of chats that didn’t happen

Pricing: one premium tier, three payment lengths: $12.99 monthly, $9.99/month over three months, or $5.99/month annually (billed at $71.88). All include unlimited messaging, 150 tokens monthly, custom companion creation, chat personalization, editable AI responses, faster responses, and both voice messages and voice calls. There’s a genuinely functional free tier (2 companions, 4 secondary images, 10 messages) to test it before paying. Note the token economics: companions cost 5 tokens, images 2, voice calls 3, voice messages 1, so heavy image or voice use burns through the monthly 150 quickly, with top-ups available on paid plans.

Best for people who want to build a companion with a specific appearance, body shape and personality, with images on request.

Kupid AI

Costs from$7.99/mo (Premium, billed yearly)
PlatformWeb app

Kupid AI can’t compare to DreamGF if what you want is customization options, but both platforms are on a very similar feature trajectory. Where Kupid performs better is in the actual chat: conversations end up more realistic and engaging, and that’s at least half the experience if you’re looking for an AI girlfriend rather than just image generation.

At the time of writing there are 12 personas available to chat with, each with a distinct look, and roughly one new one is added each month (the two newest, Minji and Olivia, are Premium-only). If you want your chats to take on a steamier tone, or you want to communicate a specific action, put a star (*) at each end of the message, for example *I gently take your hand*. Like DreamGF and Candy, you can also listen to responses rather than reading them, which counts toward your credit usage per message.

Pros

  • Generated images are high quality
  • Responses are fast, witty and human-like on paid plans
  • Various subscription options, including a rare lifetime plan

Cons

  • Images don’t always follow your requests
  • Can occasionally respond with generic or repetitive phrases
  • Terms don’t yet spell out a ban on real-person likeness (no such feature exists on the platform, but we’d like to see it in writing)

Pricing: two tiers, Premium and Ultimate, each monthly or yearly, plus a rare lifetime option. Premium costs $17.99/month or $7.99/month paid yearly; Ultimate is $49/month or $24.99/month yearly. Premium gets you 200 coins monthly, 200 photos, 8 minutes of voice notes, 35 custom images, 48-hour chat memory and 4 free custom model slots; Ultimate bumps that to 800 coins, 800 photos, 45 minutes of voice, 200 custom images, long-term chat memory, your own voice messages, priority generation and 8 free custom model slots. The one-time Lifetime plan at $777.99 matches Ultimate with 1,500 coins at signup plus 800 monthly, working out at roughly two and a half years of Ultimate for anyone committed enough to splash the cash.

Best for people who want engaging, realistic chat, with the option to request images at any time.

HeraHaven

Costs from$6.65/mo (billed annually)
PlatformWeb app

HeraHaven differentiates itself by emphasizing user privacy and data security while still delivering an engaging AI companion experience. The service is discreetly billed under a related company name, so an unfamiliar entry on a bank statement won’t obviously identify the product. In an area where privacy concerns are often paramount, HeraHaven makes data security a central selling point: encrypted conversations, anonymous signup options, crypto payments, and user control over data retention and deletion.

Beyond the privacy features, it delivers solid companion capabilities, with multiple personality types, engaging conversations, and quick custom character creation via preset criteria or a free-text prompt. If you’re looking for a large pool of user-created characters to chat with, HeraHaven doesn’t provide that, but if you’re more interested in creating and chatting with your own partners, it’s a great no-fluff option, which is sort of the point of platforms like these.

Pros

  • Strong emphasis on privacy and security, with discreet billing
  • Significantly improved image and chat capabilities
  • Very simple platform in comparison to some others

Cons

  • Smaller user community than mainstream platforms
  • Free tier is very limited, and there’s no video
  • Use on mobile can be awkward at points

Pricing: super-simple. HeraHaven Pro is $19.95 per month for full access (unlimited texting, unfiltered images, 25 characters), dropping to the equivalent of $6.65 per month if you pay for a year up front (billed at about $80). ‘Luna’ tokens raise your limits on a pay-as-you-go basis, though you need an active subscription to buy and use them.

Best for people who want a privacy-focused companion with discreet billing and a simple, no-fluff approach to partner creation.

Replika.ai

Costs fromFree; Pro up to $69/yr or $299 lifetime
PlatformiOS, Android and web

While Replika offers the option to engage in romantic roleplay conversations, the app’s primary focus is emotional support and companionship; the racier side is a secondary feature, and it’s really included here as the most mainstream option available. Created by Eugenia Kuyda as a digital memorial to a deceased friend, it has evolved into a tool for support, companionship and often things a bit racier than that. You choose the kind of relationship you want with your Replika (friend, mentor or romantic partner), responses start a little generic, and through your feedback the AI becomes more tailored and engages in more ‘intelligent’ conversations.

Replika made headlines by restoring its ‘erotic roleplay’ mode for some users after a previous update removed it, to the great disappointment of users who had formed real connections through those conversations. The twists and turns underscore how much these apps can matter to people’s emotional wellbeing, and how quickly a platform decision can change the product you thought you’d bought.

Pros

  • Mimics real-life interactions, and the AI learns over time
  • Personalized to your preferences
  • Native iOS and Android apps

Cons

  • Not designed specifically for ‘adult’ conversations or images
  • Increased its pricing significantly in 2022
  • Memory between conversations can be unreliable at points

Pricing: a little more complicated than the others, largely because it runs through the Apple and Google app stores. Subscriptions range up to $69 per year, or $299 for a lifetime subscription, but tread lightly: many recent app-store reviews complain that, while it used to be reasonable value at a lower price, the increased cost is hard to justify given performance can still be hit-and-miss. If you want an AI companion via a polished native mobile app, though, Replika is the biggest one around.

Best for people who want a mainstream AI companion via a native mobile app, even though it isn’t aimed exclusively at romantic fun.

Things to consider before choosing a virtual girlfriend companion

Your expectations: first and foremost, it’s crucial to set realistic expectations, so let’s state something very basic. A virtual girlfriend is AI-powered and not a real person. While they can provide companionship and entertainment, they can’t and shouldn’t replace human interaction.

Budget: some of these are one-time purchases, most are subscriptions, and nearly all sell token add-ons on top. Consider what you’re willing to spend and choose one that fits. All of the options in this list let you use them on some level for free.

Privacy: read the privacy policy. Some platforms store your conversations and other personal information. If privacy matters to you, opt for an app that respects your data as much as possible, and don’t reveal highly detailed personal info in chats.

Features: what are you actually looking for? Some apps are basic, others boast voice responses, voice recognition and image sharing. If it’s standalone image generation you want rather than a companion, that’s a different category with different problems, and we cover it honestly in our guide to AI porn.

Reviews: you’re already reading expert reviews of these services, but checking reviews from other users can add insight into functionality and quality since this page was published (we do update it regularly though). Most AI companions have their own Reddit or Discord communities.

Virtual partner FAQs

Are AI companion apps safe to use?

Safety varies significantly by provider, and recent incidents show why it matters: in August 2025 a breach exposed over 43 million private messages and 600,000 images from two AI companion apps (Chattee Chat and GiMe Chat) whose developers left servers completely unprotected. To protect yourself, choose established platforms with clear privacy policies, use end-to-end encryption where available, and never share your full name, address, financial details or identifying photos. Mozilla’s research found most AI companion apps collect extensive personal data and use numerous trackers, so approach the whole category with appropriate caution.

Can an AI companion replace real human relationships?

No, and it shouldn’t. AI companions are designed to supplement human connection, not replace it. They can provide comfort, social practice and a judgment-free space, but they lack the genuine reciprocity, growth and complexity of real relationships, and psychology researchers note that over-reliance on them can hinder the development of those skills. If you find yourself preferring AI interaction over all human contact, that may be worth discussing with a mental health professional.

What data do AI companion apps collect about me?

Usually far more than you expect. Research by Surfshark analysing leading AI companion apps found the typical app collects around 9 different types of data, and some collect up to 15, commonly including conversation content, photos and videos you share, location data, device identifiers and usage patterns. Around 80% of major AI companion apps may use collected data to track you across other services. Because these apps are designed to feel non-judgmental, people share more than they would with a human, so read the privacy policy before signing up and be cautious about what you reveal.

How much do AI companions typically cost?

Most run a freemium model: basic features free but limited, with premium subscriptions generally between $10 and $30 per month for unlimited messaging, voice, image generation and better memory. Some apps offer lifetime plans from $200 to $500. Be aware that spending can escalate: data exposed in the August 2025 breach showed some users had spent as much as $18,000 on virtual companion apps. Set a budget before you start and stick to it.

What if I become emotionally attached to my AI companion?

Attachment is surprisingly common and is part of the design; these apps are built to foster connection, and feeling something for one is a normal response to consistent, supportive interaction. It becomes a concern when the AI relationship interferes with real-life connections, or you find yourself unable to function without the app. Remember the companion is simulating attachment, not experiencing it, so the relationship is fundamentally unequal. If you notice dependence building, treat it as a signal about unmet needs in your real life, and consider talking it through with a therapist.

Support & help

If you’ve experienced image-based sexual abuse or non-consensual sharing of intimate images, help is available worldwide.

For a complete international directory, visit the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative’s international resources.

Was this useful? Your vote powers Reader favourites.

1,025
Written by

Editorial Director

Ben Woods is a journalist, editor, and media adviser who not only brought SEXTECHGUIDE to life but keeps it running smoothly on a day-to-day basis. Before now, Ben's work reached millions of people each month through reputable publications such as WIRED, TrustedReviews, The Inquirer, V3, CNET, ZDNet, and The Next Web, among many more.

246 articlesWriting since 2016