DeepNude app shuts down after going viral – but deepfake tech isn’t going away

DeepNude app shuts down after going viral – but deepfake tech isn’t going away

A deepfake ‘x-ray vision’ app that algorithmically undressed photos of women was taken down by its creator last week.

Users of the $50 DeepNude app could upload a photo of a clothed woman and an algorithm would impose realistic-looking breasts and vulva onto the image. In other words, this means that even someone who had never taken a nude photograph could end up being the victim of revenge porn.

The app only worked with images of women, because – according to its creator, who goes by the alias “Alberto” – “it’s easy to find thousands of images of nude women online in porn.”

But in the statement announcing the removal of the site, its creator said “the world is not yet ready for DeepNude.”

“Alberto” removed the DeepNude after a Motherboard article reporting the story led the site to crash due to traffic overload.

The statement said: “We created this project for users’ entertainment… we never though it would become viral and we would not be able to control the traffic. Despite the safety measures adopted (watermarks), if 500,000 people use it, the probability that people will misuse it is too high.”

Deepfake technology already exists – and there’s no single solution

Despite DeepNude’s creator saying the world isn’t ready for the app yet, the tech is clearly already there. Simply hoping that no one will abuse the technology isn’t enough, but there’s no one simple solution to tackle the issue. And it’s an issue that extends beyond porn. Just like fake news in the written media, superimposed and edited imagery look more and more like the real deal, and it’s getting increasingly difficult to distinguish the differences.

DeepNude was able to transform user-uploaded photos within seconds by using generative adversarial networks (GANs), which use an algorithm to recreate images through a huge selection of images.

The app was free to download, but users had to pay a one-off $50 fee to permanently remove watermarks from the images. When you think about how far-reaching the consequences of a superimposed image of a non-consenting woman could be, $50 doesn’t seem all that much.

This is where the real problem lies. While DeepNude’s creator removed the site, the technology is already out there. Yes, PornHub and Reddit are just two porn-sharing sites that have banned deepfake images and videos, but versions of DeepNude will already be circulating on the internet as I type. And what’s there to stop people creating similar content on other sites? Even DeepNude’s creator said what you could do with the app you could also do with Photoshop, after a few hours of tutorial.

Simply hoping that people will avoid creating deepfake imagery due to its questionable morals doesn’t go far enough.

Read Next: UK to review laws around deepfake and revenge porn

Affiliate Disclosure

Some articles contain affiliate links that allow us to earn money to help pay for the site if you decide to purchase any of these products or services, at no extra cost to you. Affiliate links have no relation to review ratings or other editorial coverage.

Full Affiliate Policy
(opens in Pop-Up)
Affiliate Links

SEXTECHGUIDE may sometimes include affiliate links that provide us with a small amount of money (at no additional expense to you) if you purchase any of the services or products covered in news, reviews, or other written articles.

Any articles that include affiliate links always include an affiliate disclosure for full transparency.

Review Policy

Review scores and other coverage is provided entirely impartially whether it includes affiliate links or not. Our only editorial aim is to provide as accurate information as possible for readers based on our own experiences and knowledge.

As an independent publication, we pride ourselves on the assessments, summaries and reviews that we provide, regardless of whether a product has been purchased by SEXTECHGUIDE, or provided via public relations for an honest review on the site.

We may review devices that are received free-of-charge – we never guarantee reviews for devices sent to us, nor do we provide positive reviews in exchange for devices or access to digital services.

Our editorial policy and independence is vitally important to us. It has been crafted drawing upon more than 13 years publishing experience – we wouldn’t jeopardise this reputation for a free product of any kind.

Sponsored Posts

We do not currently offer sponsored posts of any kind, and would never offer sponsored reviews.

If you have any questions about our affiliate policy, please get in touch via [email protected]

Leave a Reply