Guides
Best VR Porn Sites
Best Gay & Trans VR Porn Sites
Best AI Porn Generators
Best AI Girlfriend Apps
Best XXX Cam Sites
Best Chromecast Porn Sites
Best Porn Apps
Best iPhone Porn Sites
Sound-responsive Vibrators
OnlyFans Alternatives
Best Toys for People with Disabilities
Best Mini Vibrators

Google’s banning ‘sugar dating’ apps from the Play Store

In a change to its official Google Play content policy terms, Google will remove all ‘sugar dating’ apps from the store from September 1, and new apps of the same type will be banned.

Google made a similar change to its advertising policies earlier in 2021, but this tweak is specifically aimed at preventing people from downloading ‘sugar daddy’ apps from the Play Store. However, as with other types of Android apps that aren’t allowed on the Play Store, you’ll still be able to sideload them directly onto tablets and phones.

“We’re updating the Inappropriate Content policy to institute new restrictions on sexual content, specifically prohibiting compensated sexual relationships (i.e., sugar dating),” the policy update document states.

While Google Play has slightly more permissive app rules than the Apple Store, both repositories have a fairly negative view of sex-related content being able to be easily downloaded through their stores. Apps that allow escort services or promote sex-related content were already banned, but that definition now explicitly includes the previously gray area of sugar dating.

The reason for the change isn’t stated, but it’s in line with the general move to introduce increasingly strict rules and regulations over how adult content is presented online. Ostensibly, behind many of the regulatory proposals — such as FOSTA/SESTA, the ‘Safe Tech Act’, SISEA and other changes to Section 230 — is the stated goal of protecting people from potentially dangerous situations: whether that’s preventing minors from accessing porn, or ensuring that people aren’t harassed online.

However, they’re often poorly thought through (and implemented), and regularly make life harder for sex workers, both on and off-line. For example, Cathy Reisenwitz, vice president of communications at the San Francisco Sex-Positive Democratic Club, thinks the Safe Tech Act will make life more difficult for sex workers, and fail to prevent stalking and harassment.

“The SAFE TECH Act would likely mean only two types of content see the light of day online: highly polished, inoffensive, pro-corporate professionally produced content and free, antisocial, low-quality, totally unmoderated user-generated content of the 4chan variety, ” she wrote. “This will mean more harassment, stalking, and bigotry on the net, not less.”

Read Next: What is SISEA? And Why is it Bad for Sex Workers and Porn Sites

Ready for more?
Ben
Ben

Ben Woods is a passionate journalist, editor, and media adviser who not only brought SEXTECHGUIDE to life but keeps it running smoothly on a day-to-day basis.Before embarking on this exciting journey, Ben's work reached millions of people through reputable publications such as WIRED, TrustedReviews, The Inquirer, V3, CNET, ZDNet, and The Next Web, among many more.Ben dives deep into the realms of tech, sex, and the future on SEXTECHGUIDE, inviting readers to explore the intriguing intersection of these domains.

Be the first to leave a comment
      Leave a reply

      SEXTECHGUIDE
      Logo
      LATEST
      Comparisons and Guides
      Best VR Porn Sites
      Best Gay & Trans VR Porn Sites
      Best AI Porn Generators
      Best AI Girlfriend Apps
      Best XXX Cam Sites
      Best Chromecast Porn Sites
      Best Porn Apps
      Best iPhone Porn Sites
      Sound-responsive Vibrators
      OnlyFans Alternatives
      Best Toys for People with Disabilities
      Best Mini Vibrators